I love you Nintendo, but...

I love you Nintendo, but...
Keri's thoughts on the 3DS.

New 'Super 8' Trailer

New 'Super 8' Trailer
Dylan loves some Abrams.

Two Kobe Bryants

Two Kobe Bryants
Tom lays some truth.

Where's Green Lantern's Ads?

Where's Green Lantern's Ads?
Aaron's greatest fear!

The Problem With DC Comics Movies

Friday, July 2, 2010

By Aaron Ting




Anyone who knows me personally can attest to my love of superheroes. Ask me something about these characters and I'll rant for hours about how they're 'American Mythology' - I truly believe superheroes are the genuine American folklore. 
An American pantheon

While my beloved comic books are a fading novelty yet to be replaced, Hollywood films have made significant progress in passing these superhero myths on to the next generation of Americans. Marvel films have been startlingly effective. Children today know Spider-Man far better than they know Superman - and that wouldn't have been possible without the movies. Sure, Fantastic Four and Elektra were considerable missteps, but the mainstream's awareness of Marvel's front-and-center characters is growing with each summer movie season. I never thought I'd see kids in a Burger King arguing about whether Iron Man was cooler than Batman (and Iron Man prevailed in that argument). It's totally reflective of how Marvel characters have penetrated our mythology; when Disney bought Marvel, it was a sign that Spider-Man and other Marvel characters had become timeless - like Mickey Mouse or Superman, they are characters that will still be in our stories decades from now.

Now Marvel had a pretty smart strategy when it came to films - a plan that stretched all the way back to Blade. That's right, it wasn't X-Men or Spider-Man; we have Wesley Snipes to thank for this superhero movie renaissance. Had Blade failed financially, the entire landscape of Marvel films could have turned out differently. 

But where does this leave my other favorite comics publisher? The continued absence of a Superman movie and the recent failure of Jonah Hex have me increasingly worried about the cinematic vitality of DC Comics characters. Simply put, it's been clear lately that the company that owns DC Comics - Warner Brothers - just didn't have a plan.

I'm willing to admit that it's harder to forge a film continuity where all the DC Comics characters can co-exist. It's hard to explain why Gotham needs Batman in a world that has Superman and the Flash. Chris Nolan, who has been helming the Batman films and pondering a new Superman film franchise, has been fairly adamant about keeping these two iconic characters in wholly separate worlds. Batman is the only superhero in his world; sames goes with Superman. On the one hand, Nolan is actually communicating a pretty keen understanding of these characters. He wants to stay true to who these characters are, but doesn't see a way to do that without keeping them in their separate, sterile realities. 

The problem, however, is that a lot of DC Comics properties just don't work without an established cohesive universe. Teen Titans, once a more popular team than the X-Men, is an impossible story to tell in a film unless the audience can be told that these teenage sidekicks' mentors all exist in the same world. The Justice League, arguably the most important and most financially-viable team in DC's stable, is a team that can't be put together if the big five - Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, and the Flash - are all in separate film franchises that each preclude the existence of the other franchises.

It's possible that DC could pursue a two-pronged approach. They could allow Nolan to take Batman and Superman out of the equation and let them have their own separate universes, and the rest of the DC characters can share a film-adapted 'DC Universe.' But let's be honest here, people will throw riots if they see a trailer for a Justice League movie that doesn't have the two World's Finest superheroes. (see right)

What seems so crazy to me is that the pieces are all there to make a cohesive film continuity. Jonah Hex didn't have to be pointless; it could've been the movie that set up the DC Universe without actually having to show how all the other superheroes are connected. DC properties have a very historic, generational aspect to them; if Warner Brothers had come up with a plan, Jonah Hex could've planted the seeds for the entire direction of DC's films: we could've seen a background character excavating a green lantern, a cameo by the immortal Vandal Savage (a major Justice League villain), and even perhaps some tongue-and-cheek reference to the Flash's "speed force." Hex could've gone from a crappy cowboy movie to a mediocre cowboy movie with just enough to make the Comic-Con crowd foam at the mouth for more DC movies.

I've been trying not to get my hopes up too high for the upcoming Green Lantern film, but it's hard when I'm such an unrepentant Green Lantern fan. Green Lantern would be such a perfect way to bring this colorful, fictional universe together. Green Lantern origin stories usually involve a ring flying around the planet seeking a worthy owner with the will  to overcome fear. Rumors of early Green Lantern drafts hinted that we'd see this in the film, and the ring would whiz by some 'recognizable' candidates - like Clark Kent. But then an interview with the film's director revealed that, to his knowledge, this was no longer part of the script. Seriously?

I desperately want to see these characters dutifully adapted to film. This can be done in tasteful way that doesn't alienate the mainstream or anger the loyal fans. It doesn't need to be some massive twenty-picture strategy. Marvel didn't succeed because they had some meticulously-detailed agenda; they succeeded because they had the courage to try out a small movie with a vampire hunter, and the foresight to put Samuel Jackson at the end of Iron Man


Warner Brothers knows they need to do something with all these profitable characters. They've announced a Christmas 2012 release date for the next Superman movie - without having a confirmed director, cast, or even a script. But it finally occurred to Warner Bros that they should be consulting (or promoting) some of the creative talent at DC Comics - you know, those guys that actually write superhero stories for a living. This is a step in the right direction, and hopefully one that will lead to more thoughtful decisions than Jonah Hex.


Now if one of those thoughtful decisions leads to this movie, all will be forgiven.










5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The way out of this dilemma for Warner/DC is to go from the current "one hero per universe" approach to a JLA story with becoming aware of the others being the intro. The way they're telling it today in no way precludes there being other heroes in other cities - they're just not referred to, largely because they're some place else and are therefore irrelevant to those stories. Or because, as with the Superman movies, it wouldn't occur to Superman to enlist his friend (or frenemy) Batman to help him fight Lex Luthor because he didn't imagine that he'd be of any assistance, and besides his attitude is more "I've got this".

Being restricted in this manner has not been an issue with any of the scripts written so far - it would not have helped any of the lamer ones to have other heroes involved, in fact it would have only made things worse. Once all the major heroes are introduced to the movie audience, then you can bring them together. Having the little hints or connections are fun, I'll admit, for Marvel geeks, but not having them in no way obstructs future team-up's once the characters are all established independently.

But I agree: get on it with it, already! Marvel's OK, and most of their movies have been very good, but their characters cannot compete with the DC roster IF the latter is properly handled and scripted. Nolan has shown that; Singer came close. I have every reason to believe Green Lantern will be the best comic book movie ever done, simply because they're telling a story that surpasses anything ever attempted: down in the dirt gritty Earth-based realism to galactic action that will beat anything attempted by Star Wars, Star Trek, Avatar - you name it.

In 5 years DC will have established itself as the superior universe, and they'll rule all media over Marvel - IF they do it expeditiously, and do it right.

July 2, 2010 at 12:09 PM
reedsolomon.matr1x at gmail.com said...

I don't think its necessary. Green Lantern is its own universe in the way Batman and Superman are their own universe. To be fair, each universe has a ton of spinoff characters. Superman has the Legion of super heroes, batman has all the robins and batgirls et all, There are more than 7200 living Green Lanterns as of this exact moment.. Let Marvel do their own thing and DC can do their own thing. I don't want a forced Justice League. It'll happen if it happens, and does it really need to happen? JL/JLU was a great cartoon that truly is its own world while acknowledging what came prior. Nobody thought that the cartoon Batman and Superman would go to a Justice League cartoon, but it happened without any real planning.

Frankly, I'd rather see a stand alone Martian Manhunter movie and stand alone Flash movie and perhaps even a Booster Gold movie.

July 2, 2010 at 9:06 PM
Anonymous said...

Good Lord, if there ever was a topic that's been "over-thought", it's how to put DC characters on film in the same continuity.

It can be easily done, and it isn't rocket science to accomplish it. I'm not going to waste time explaining how when I shouldn't have to.

I've long criticized Warner for being so clueless about how to handle DC's stable of characters on screen. They have a worse record of misses than Marvel because there simply is no cohesive strategy. The hailed creation of DC Entertainment to challenge Marvel Entertainment, in my view, is more smoke and mirrors than anything else. Warner is STILL letting individual Directors chart their own course with a given property with no regard to an over all plan or any creative control by DC Entertainment.

Marvel's strategy is pure genius, even with misses, overall it will succeed in ways Warner could only wish for.

Think about future DVD sales alone. I can see a boxed set of all of Marvel's solo movies (Iron Man, Thor, Captain America etc. being bundled together with the final Avengers film) Sales!, Sales!, Sales!

What will Warner have to counter that?

Zilch.

Green Lantern will probably be a hit, LOBO, like Jonah Hex, will most likely tank.

Warner is in desperate need of a cohesive strategy like Marvel's, and until they seize upon it, from a business perspective, they'll continue to trail behind Marvel.

July 3, 2010 at 5:23 AM
Anonymous said...

it maybe the only hope for this film universe to make a crossover.yeah most heroes have thier personasl styles and individuality but there comes a day when they might have to come against a single threat no single hero can withstand.batman's role for example should be expanded to world recognized superhero instead of just limited to city.if not his vison for a safe world will suck

July 3, 2010 at 11:08 PM
Anonymous said...

besides if all batman's gadgets are unexplored in the third movie,stuff like the batrobot and electrocuting batarangs can appear to supplement his lack of superpowers in a multicharacter battle like war machine and ironman vs whiplashing crimsondynamo

July 3, 2010 at 11:31 PM

Post a Comment

 

2010 ·WordsFinest ...Greetings from Boulder